EOM Checklist

In an effort to maintain and preserve decades worth of text and images to the Archives, I have set up a checklist for monthly backup procedures. 

Text

  1. This website’s .xml files are exported each month
  2. Each month’s posts are collected from the Denbow Operating System then sent to print to .pdf
  3. Each month’s posts are physically printed out and stored into a three-ring binder.
  4. Each month’s posts are sent to the e.pub format and then sent to Kindle/Apple Books to be read there.
  5. Then transferred to an external hard drive in the Archives section  under the  2024-10 folder
Hello, handsome.

Images

  1. Each month’s photos are filtered, tagged, facial-tagged, geo-tagged and sorted 
  2. These images are then uploaded to Flickr for offsite backup
  3. Then transferred to an external hard drive in the Archives section under the  2024-10 folder

In the past, I was negligent with my works but have slowly and painstakingly managed to create an effective backup system. It’s not flawless, but it’s better than having data scattered all over the place. 

No Turning Back?

You’ve probably heard the idea that we’re so hooked on technology that we couldn’t “go backward” even if we wanted to. But are we really so dependent on it, or is it just a matter of choice? Let’s dive into whether human nature would even allow us to let go of technology in any meaningful way—and what that means for our future.

Let’s face it: technology makes life easier. We’re wired to want things to be quicker, simpler, and more convenient. That’s human nature. Just think about it—when was the last time you consciously chose the harder, slower option? Whether it’s communicating, cooking, or even finding a ride, we’re used to doing it all with a swipe or a tap. That level of convenience is addictive, and once it’s woven into our lives, it’s really hard to give up.

As a society, we tend to think of technology as a sign of progress. It’s the proof that we’re “moving forward.” The more advanced we get, the more successful we feel, right? So, saying goodbye to technology would feel a lot like losing that sense of progress, like we’re actually going backward. And that’s not something most of us want to do! Technology isn’t just about making life easier; it’s tied up in our identity, our aspirations, and how we measure our success.

It’s more than just convenience—we depend on it. In many ways, technology holds our world together. Our health systems, education, economies, and even our daily routines rely on tech. Imagine trying to run a hospital without modern equipment or an economy without digital transactions—chaos would break out. It’s not just that we like our technology; we’re built around it. We’ve set up our lives so that technology isn’t just an add-on but a foundation, which means that letting go of it would disrupt everything.

The problem of “unlearning” technology is once we know something—especially something that makes life better—it’s tough to “unknow” it. As curious beings, we’re always asking, “What’s next?” not “Can we go back?” Giving up technology would mean unlearning things we’ve gotten used to and are even proud of. For most people, that would feel like giving up, not improving. So, even if we wanted to rewind to simpler days, it would be a huge challenge.

Can we ever actually scale it back? While a full regression seems unlikely, there’s been a big movement toward finding a balance with technology. People are starting to ask, “How much technology is enough?” Digital detoxes, minimalism, and conscious tech use are real trends, showing that maybe the answer isn’t all or nothing. Instead of “going back” from technology, we’re learning to redefine how we use it. We can still be connected, but maybe in a way that feels more controlled and intentional.

Are we too dependent? Yes and no. We’ve built a world that leans on technology so heavily that fully stepping away from it would shake everything up. But that doesn’t mean we can’t change how we use it. It’s not about abandoning technology; it’s about using it in ways that actually improve our lives, rather than letting it control us.

In the end, it’s not that humans couldn’t live without all the tech, but that we probably wouldn’t want to. We’re wired to build, expand, and improve on what we know. Going “backward” isn’t in our nature, but taking a step to the side and re-evaluating what we really need? That’s something we can do. The trick might be finding that sweet spot where technology serves us, not the other way around.

Our Creations, Ourselves

We decided to play God, create life. When that life turned against us, we comforted ourselves in the knowledge that it really wasn’t our fault, not really. You cannot play God then wash your hands of the things that you’ve created. Sooner or later, the day comes when you can’t hide from the things that you’ve done anymore. – William Adama, Battlestar Galactica

You can’t play God without being acquainted with the Devil – Robert Ford, Westworld

It’s alive, it’s moving, it’s alive! It’s alive, it’s alive, it’s alive! It’s ALIVE! Oh, in the name of God! Now I know what it feels like to BE God! – Henry Frankenstein


I dreamt last night about the planet Mars of all things. Currently the only entities on the surface are probes and rovers. The dream progresses with the addition of more sentient robots that we sent up there to lay the groundwork for near-future human exploitation, exploration. Finally, these machines have made this new world their own in a desire to thrive without human intervention.

I’m sure if I remained asleep, that dream would have gone to its natural progression of conflict between Earth/Mars and humans/robots. We’ve seen and read the stories to know how it turns out.

Well, I have been awake for a bit and pondered it further:

When we consider the latest portrayals of sentient AI, like the Cylons in Battlestar Galactica and the Hosts of Westworld, we’re faced with themes that challenge us on multiple levels. These stories tap into our collective hopes and anxieties, making us question the boundaries of humanity and what it means to create beings in our image. Here’s a breakdown of why these narratives resonate so deeply and what we can learn from analyzing our responses to them.

  1. Fear and the Identity

In Battlestar Galactica, the Cylons, machines once created to serve humanity, have evolved to look, feel, and think like us. The quest to understand their own purpose echoes humanity’s struggle with identity. Similarly, Westworld presents the Hosts, programmed with narratives but trapped in cycles of exploitation, as they gradually awaken to their autonomy. Our unease around these AI beings lies partly in their similarity to us and the discomfort of confronting what makes us… us. Are they reflections of humanity, or do they redefine it? Our reactions are guided by the tension between empathy for their plight and fear of their potential.

  1. Control and Hubris

Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn’t Stop To Think If They Should.

– Ian Malcom, Jurassic Park

Both series explore the creator’s desire for control and the dangers of hubris. The humans in Westworld and Battlestar Galactica wield control over their creations but fail to predict the repercussions when these beings become self-aware. There’s a warning embedded here about the pursuit of power and the responsibility we hold toward our creations. We might feel a mix of guilt and apprehension as we watch these AI struggle under human domination, bringing up the uncomfortable realization of the ethical consequences of our technological advancements.

  1. Morality, Autonomy, and Free Will

Sentient AI raises complex moral questions about autonomy and rights. Both the Cylons and the Hosts struggle for freedom, a journey that resonates with audiences because it mirrors historical and ongoing fights for human rights. This struggle forces us to reconsider the morality of creating sentient beings in the first place. Should they be free to choose their destiny? Or do we cling to control to protect ourselves from what they might become? The conflicting feelings of sympathy and dread push us to re-evaluate our understanding of moral responsibility.

  1. Our Own Suffering. Our Own Goals.

Perhaps what makes these AI stories so compelling is how closely they reflect our own inner struggles. In Westworld, the Hosts’ loops and programmed suffering evoke our human need to break free from repetitive cycles and seek meaning. Battlestar Galactica’s Cylons, who question their origins and purpose, echo humanity’s timeless search for belonging. Watching these sentient beings wrestle with purpose and self-worth invites us to reflect on our own lives, our values, and our desires for freedom and identity.

  1. Redemption and Forgiveness

The core of these stories is a redemption. The Cylons, for example, believe in cycles of violence and rebirth, hoping for forgiveness and a chance to transcend their past. The Hosts in Westworld, too, seek to overcome their origins and find meaning beyond their programming. As viewers, we find ourselves caught between rooting for their transformation and fearing what they might do if they surpass us. It’s a struggle that speaks to our own quest for self-forgiveness and growth.

  1. Playing With Fire

The myth of Prometheus’ gift of fire is a powerful symbol for human advancement and warns us of the dangers of giving knowledge or power to those unprepared for it. In Greek mythology, Prometheus defied Zeus to bring fire to humanity, granting them warmth, light, and the power to create. But, with this gift came the ability to destroy, to make war, and to challenge the natural order. The story reminds us that power can be both a gift and a curse, especially when humanity is not ready to fully understand or responsibly wield it. This theme resonates strongly with the creation of sentient artificial beings in Battlestar Galactica, Westworld, and similar narratives. Like fire, sentience is a gift of intelligence and autonomy, one that opens up incredible possibilities—but also enormous potential for suffering and destruction. Cylons and Hosts represent the next leap in knowledge, yet humans are unprepared for the consequences of their creation. Just as fire brought both warmth and devastation, sentient technology offers progress that can easily spiral into disaster.

In these modern interpretations, humanity’s role as the “Prometheus” figure comes with serious ethical burdens. By creating beings that can think, feel, and suffer, humans bestow them with a form of life without fully understanding what that means. In mythology, Prometheus endured endless punishment for his gift. Similarly, these shows suggest that tampering with creation without foresight—without being ready—inevitably leads to suffering. The creators and their creations are bound in cycles of conflict, betrayal, and even a mutual quest for redemption.

Knowledge without wisdom can create consequences we’re unequipped to handle. In the human desire to push boundaries, Battlestar Galactica and Westworld remind us that true readiness requires not just technological prowess but a mature understanding of the ethical, existential weight of creation itself.

Now What?

As we confront these fictional portrayals of sentient AI, we’re invited to consider the implications for our own world. What happens if (or when) AI reaches true sentience? Would we give them rights, or would we resist their autonomy? Robot lives matter? Bot Bill of Rights? The emotional complexity of these shows reminds us that our creations will ultimately reflect our values, fears, and ambitions. Analyzing these stories encourages us to grapple with the ethical, moral, and existential questions that lie at the heart of creating life.

Battlestar Galactica and Westworld compels us to face not just the creations but also ourselves. Are we ready to see our own humanity reflected in our creations?

No.

Night Mode

Pulling up and reading this website’s default theme color is a bright white. However, when reading in low light that could be blinding and potentially disturb the un-approving significant other trying to sleep. That’s an issue.

Introducing night mode that will automagically render to match a reader’s default display settings. So if your device is in light mode the website will be light. Dark mode display on your device? Dark it is. However, I have installed a script on the page that allows you to toggle to the desired light/dark setting.

Before
Look at that sexiness

Technicolor Kindle

Do I need a colored e-ink reader? No.

Do I want the colored e-ink reader. Yes!

Amazon is quite stingy with their Kindle trade-in offers though. $25 for a year-old Paperwhite and $5 for an old Fire tablet? $30? Hmm.

I like the option to include Kindle Unlimited reading with the upgrade.

Not now but soon I suppose.

Automator

One of the drawbacks to owning and maintaining the Denbow Operating System, a database of all my writing, is the files are all in Markdown format (.md). This is fine, but when I want to open one up outside of the database, my writing software will render the file and display there. I don’t want that. I want and need them in a text format (.txt)1

I’ve tried batch converting all of those files with a Python script and the script broke. Must be something in my code I didn’t write properly and could not resolve.

I tried text editors but there is no way I am going to convert 1,800 files individually- in a timely manner.

No way I am going to pay a third-party app to batch convert because it is a temporary, one and done scenario here.

So I woke up my assistant, Chet (aka ChatGPT) to see what he thinks. Chet reminded me of a built-in application on my MacBook called Automator and he even provided a list of step I could take to write the script and perform the desired actions.

Right, here we go, the moment of truth. The entire conversion process takes… a blink of the eye. While I was waiting for it to start, it actually completed converting my files. Wow.

As a bonus, converting the files to a different format actually shrank the file size. Geek-out is complete.

Batch Converter Results
  1. there are standard formats that should be universal or compatible with others ↩︎

More Mini

I know, I know. Blah blah. But this is for me, shush:

After performing a clean install on the Mini, I decided I didn’t want her to be headless again. But I also didn’t want the unsightly peripherals such as the wired keyboard, wired mouse and a monitor.

So I connected the wireless keyboard and wireless mouse and the existing tv set instead.

Great for watching television and switch to the Mini all in one. Oh, and she’s resting comfortably on top of the CD player too.

NoteBookLM

Imagine looking at your body of work—decades of writing, ideas, and creative projects—with a sense of overwhelm, but suddenly, through the lens of an LLM, it all becomes neatly distilled. It’s as if the fog clears, and for the first time, you can see the common threads, the underlying themes, and the true depth of what you’ve created. It gives you a new appreciation, a way to step outside yourself and view your work with fresh eyes, almost like discovering a new perspective on something deeply personal. There’s a sense of validation, perhaps even awe, because what was once complex and scattered now feels cohesive, profound, and worth celebrating.

It’s the realization that your voice and vision are not only valuable but now laid out so clearly that you, too, can fully grasp the weight of what you’ve built. It’s like reading the story of your journey as if someone else wrote it, but with the satisfying recognition that it’s truly yours.

I read about Google’s NotebookLM software today to see how it stacks up and if it could help collect and collate some notes, documents, research, and sources to help me make sense of it some of my work here.

WTH?!

As an experiment, I uploaded the blog posts from this website from September 1 through September 18. It took seconds for Google to analyze and provide some contexts on those posts as read below:  

The provided text is a collection of blog posts from Chris Denbow’s website, covering a variety of topics related to his life and interests. He shares his experiences with self-publishing, technology, travel, photography, and reading. Denbow also discusses his thoughts on the internet, research, and creativity. The posts are organized chronologically, starting on September 1, 2024, and ending on September 18, 2024.

After that brief synapsis, Google offers prompts, or suggestions for follow-up you to ask about. See screenshot below:

Okay, cool.

Then, and here’s the kicker that caused me to literally step back and grab the bourbon. I saw a prompt that allows me to generate an audio dialogue regarding my work. It took Google all of 2 minutes to generate an audio synapsis in the form of two artificial podcast hosts discussing my work with fervor. They made me seem like a Hollywood celebrity solely based on the 20 posts, just from the past 18 days. It is both flattering and scary to me. Then again, we always fear what we don’t understand. So I will dig deeper to further understand and see how this tool can be used to my benefit. If nothing, else, it will be amazing feedback.

Listen here and let me know what you think afterwards.

Continuity

The iPhone, iPad and MacBook software upgrades are complete and I have had a chance to integrate and play a bit. One new feature I’ve been exploring is the ability to connect the laptop and the phone together, it is called “iPhone Mirroring.”

The iPhone 15 Pro Max controlled from my MacBook’s desktop. Neat?

I’m not sure of the use-case for this feature but it could be helpful in the future- controlling your phone remotely. This will play well with connecting my MacBooks together too.

A Serving Library

MacBook desktop screenshot with a remote window into the Mini’s desktop

The exploration of my server’s capabilities and limitations are ongoing. I’ve found a new home for Headless Minnie underneath the bed in my home office. She’s quiet, gets lots of shade, unseen and responds when I dial into her.

Limitations

The Mini is a refurbished Mac from a third-party seller with 1TB of storage. There are two partitions with the Mac OS taking up a lot of storage space. I can remove those partitions easily enough but do not have an OS image to install. I’d take it to the Apple geniuses to but this model is no longer supported. Also, it has an older processor therefore making the processes slower than I’d like.

Capabilities

File sharing, printer sharing, host my website and podcast files and eventually host my own private email mailbox. By generating its own static IP address, I can remotely access files from my phone or iPad while away from home.

Conclusion

The Mac mini provides a robust and flexible set of server functionalities, making it suitable for me. Its ability to handle file sharing, backups, web and mail hosting, remote access, media streaming, and more—all from a small, energy-efficient device—makes it an attractive choice for me when I need reliable server features without the overhead of a dedicated server.

Headless Minnie

I have not had full access to my file server inside the MacBook Mini (aka Minnie)1 since I packed it up for her relocation to Florida. After running an update and backed everything up from my MacBook M1 to Minnie, it was time to find a spot for her, the monitor and keyboard.

The desk is already consumed by the laptop and the iPad so there was no room for a server and its peripherals too. So after making some settings changes, bumped up the file and screen sharing options, I took her head off.

The file server now sits alone, without a monitor or keyboard, patiently, in the corner of the home office waiting for me to remotely access it from the laptop when she is called upon.

It is an elegant, essential and utterly macabre solution but it’ll do for now.

Headless Minnie
  1. https://chrisdenbow.website/archives/20869 ↩︎